Energy comparison
collecting…
The conventional bar grows at a constant rate because a clocked processor burns power on every cycle whether or not anything happened. The neuromorphic bar grows only when neurons spike. Turn the threshold up or the input frequency down and watch the gap widen — that sparsity is the whole advantage.
What am I looking at?
Every horizontal band is one neuron and time flows left to right. A dot appears the instant that neuron fires. Dense vertical stripes mean the population is firing together; scattered dots mean each cell is responding to its own input.
How the neuron works
This is a leaky integrate-and-fire model. Charge arrives, the membrane voltage climbs, and a little leaks away each millisecond. When the voltage crosses the threshold the neuron emits a spike, resets to zero and ignores input for a 3 ms refractory period — exactly like a biological cell.
Try this experiment
Set the threshold to 2.0 and the weight to 0.1. Almost nothing fires, and neuromorphic energy flatlines while the conventional bar keeps climbing. Now raise the weight to 1.0: the raster fills in and the efficiency advantage shrinks. Sparse inputs are where brain-inspired silicon wins.
Why the numbers differ
Neuromorphic cost is modelled as roughly 25 picojoules per synaptic event plus a tiny leakage term. Conventional cost is a fixed per-neuron-per-millisecond figure, because the clock never stops. These are illustrative orders of magnitude drawn from published Loihi and TrueNorth figures, not measurements.